The IPO wave is here and I’m getting paid monthly

The chip and data center complex just had its worst two days since April 2025, and the stated cause is a senator from Vermont demanding something a sitting president has promised to veto. That disconnect deserves more scrutiny than the market is currently giving it.

The Investment Question

Can the Sanders-AOC Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, refreshed Wednesday evening after Democrats swept both chambers in Tuesday’s midterms, actually halt the AI build-out, or is this legislative posturing with a presidential veto waiting at the end of the road? The answer determines whether this week’s carnage in NVDA, VRT, GEV, PWR, ETN, ORCL, and CRWV is a buying opportunity or an early warning.

The Bull Case

The Sanders-AOC bill would freeze the construction of any new data centers across the country until lawmakers set safeguards covering power prices, environmental damage and local consent. On paper that sounds terminal for the build-out. In practice, the pipeline is far deeper than the political moment suggests.

Vertiv CEO Giordano Albertazzi said “we are in the middle of the largest infrastructure buildout and it’s accelerating,” and the company just reported Q3 net sales of $4.313 billion, 61% higher than a year earlier. GE Vernova carries a $197 billion backlog and $29.3 billion in Q3 orders. Neither company needs a single new permit approved this week to stay busy well into 2027. Three quarters of the 37 gigawatts of data center power due in 2027 is already under construction.

The veto math also favors the bulls directly. Trump can veto federal bills, and a vetoed bill becomes law only if two-thirds of both chambers vote to override it. Trump said in late October that if Democrats controlled Congress, he would “veto everything.” There is no realistic path to a two-thirds override on AI legislation. Analysts expect Nvidia’s EPS to more than double by fiscal 2029, yet its forward P/E has compressed to a five-year low. At those multiples, a temporary political scare is not a reason to permanently mark down the demand curve.

The Bear Case

The federal veto is real, but it is not the only risk in this debate. Goldman Sachs analysts expect Democratic governors in Texas, Georgia and Michigan to impose conditional moratoriums pending new legislation restricting data centers, legislation that could end certain tax breaks and tighten environmental, water and electricity rules. Governors do not need Trump’s signature to freeze state permitting.

Texas governor-elect Gina Hinojosa has called for more permanent and expansive restrictions than the pauses already in place, and Texas accounts for a large share of planned U.S. data center capacity. UBS estimates that roughly 30% of expected 2028 U.S. data center additions could face pauses. That is not a rounding error. Nvidia’s data center revenue reached about $89 billion last quarter, roughly 93% of total sales, which means any sustained slowdown in U.S. permitting lands directly on the company’s most critical revenue line.

The permitting risk also has a geographic escape valve worth tracking. GE Vernova has been signing behind-the-meter power agreements that bypass the public grid entirely, a structure that could sidestep state permitting freezes altogether.

Most members of both parties have rejected the idea of a moratorium, but it has gained traction with progressives including the former chair of the Progressive Caucus. Democratic control of Congress gives that bloc real leverage over committee agendas and budget negotiations, even short of passing the bill outright. That is a less dramatic but more durable form of pressure than the market is modeling.

Where the Evidence Leads

The selloff priced in a scenario the federal veto almost certainly prevents. Argent Capital Management portfolio manager Jed Ellerbroek told Reuters that “the size of the moves was outsized,” describing the action as feeling like “the capitulation phase for the data center capex beneficiary stocks.” That read is persuasive at the federal level.

The backlog argument cuts both ways, though. Oracle’s record contract backlog and collapsing stock show how a verified demand signal can coexist with a severe valuation reset.

At the state level, it is not. The moratorium cannot clear the Oval Office. State-level permitting freezes in Texas and Georgia do not need to. Democratic control of Congress may strengthen the bill’s prospects, but a presidential veto could still block it. The real trade here is not about whether Sanders wins in Washington. It is about whether three or four Democratic governors can slow the 2028 build schedule enough to miss current consensus estimates.

What Could Change the Debate

Nvidia reports its third-quarter results on November 17. Any guidance commentary on U.S. permitting timelines or customer order behavior will immediately reset the range of outcomes. Watch GE Vernova’s backlog conversion rate and Vertiv’s order growth for signs that project delays are moving from political rhetoric into actual cancellations.

Final Verdict

The federal moratorium is noise. The state-level permitting risk is real but concentrated in the 2028 pipeline, not the contracts already under construction. The bull case holds for companies with large existing backlogs. It is shakier for those whose valuations depend on 2028 and beyond coming through on schedule. Confidence is moderate: the veto anchor is firm, but three or four governors moving in the same direction, without needing anyone’s permission, is a risk the two-day selloff has at least correctly identified, even if it has probably overstated it.